Full text : Das Saarland zwischen Frankreich, Deutschland und Europa

parties  were  back  in  the  field  and  I  had  had  an  opportunity  of  going  up  to  the  Saar
to  see  how  things  were  shaping.
2.  It  is  now  possible  to  say  what  the  attitude  of  the  different  sections  of  Saar
opinion,  at  least  as  expressed  by  the  six  parties  now  in  existence,  is  towards  the  Referendum
  question.  The  Christliche  Volkspartei  (C.V.P.)  and  Sozialdemokratische
Partei  des  Saarlandes  (S.P.S.)  say  „yes“  to  the  Statute,  the  Christlichdemokratische
Union  des  Saarlandes  (C.D.U.),  Deutsche  Sozialdemokratische  Partei  (D.S.P.),  Demokratische
  Partei  des  Saarlandes  (D.P.S.)  and  Kommunistische  Partei  (K.P.)  say
„no“.  1  have  heard  no  mention  of  the  Demokratische  Volkspartei  (D.V.)  referred  to
in  para.  2  of  Christopher  Audland’s  letter  1/163/55  of  june  6  to  youls  and  I  think
we  may  take  it  that  it  is  dead.
3.  It  was  expected  that  the  D.S.P  (which  corresponds  to  and  with  the  S.P.D.  in  the
Federal  Republic)  and  the  D.P.S.  (the  F.D.P.  in  the  Federal  Republic),  as  also  the
Communists,  would  urge  their  supporters  to  vote  against  the  Statute.  The  most  interesting,
  and  possibly  the  crucial,  decision  is  that  of  the  C.D.U.  to  urge  its  supporters
  to  vote  „no“;  as  Gerald  Meade  said  in  para.  5  of  his  letter  1/190/55  of  July  18
to  Pat  Hancock18 19  (not  copied  to  Washington),  the  leaders  of  the  party  favoured
voting  for  the  Statute  while  the  rank-and-file  were  against  it.  It  was  not  possible  for
any  decision  to  be  reached  at  the  meeting  of  the  party  leadership  on  July  20  and
this  was  deferred  until  the  official  constitution  of  the  party  on  August  7.  At  a
meeting  of  some  600  delegates  it  was  decided  (apparently  unanimously)  that  the
party  should  vote  „no“  to  the  Statute.  (The  „Saarländische  Volkszeitung“  headline
reporting  this  ran:  „C.D.U.  also  rejects  Saar  Statute.  On  the  same  footing  as  the
K.P.S.“)
4.  Although  -  and  I  know  Christopher  Audland  would  share  this  view  -  it  is  early
yet  to  talk  about  the  results  of  the  Landtag  elections  which  are  to  follow  the
Referendum  if  the  Statute  is  approved,  it  is  generally  accepted  that  the  C.D.U.  will
obtain  more  votes  than  any  other  German  party  and  not  so  generally  accepted  that
there  is  a  good  chance  of  the  C.D.U.  obtaining  more  votes  than  any  other  single
party.  It  has  been  actively  establishing  local  branches  (Ortsgruppen)  since  the  promulgation
  of  the  Referendum  laws  on  July  23  and  it  was  last  week  claimed  on  its
behalf  that  it  already  had  as  many  members  as  the  C.V.P.  However  (and  this  is  to
the  advantage  of  the  C.V.P.),  membership  is  not  the  same  as  votes  at  the  Referendum
  or  at  the  Landtag  elections.  As  I  have  already  reported,  the  C.D.U.  was  the
first  of  the  German  parties  -  this  designation  is  supposed  to  exclude  the  Communists
  who  are  merely  „pro-German“  -  to  produce  its  own  newspaper,  the  „Neueste
Nachrichten“,  which  has  appeared  daily,  except  Sundays,  since  July  26.  (It  may  be
of  interest  to  mention  here  that  the  „Neueste  Nachrichten“  is  printed  at  Saarlouis,
18  Hier  nicht  abgedruckt.
19  Hier  nicht  abgedruckt.

515
            
Waiting...

Note to user

Dear user,

In response to current developments in the web technology used by the Goobi viewer, the software no longer supports your browser.

Please use one of the following browsers to display this page correctly.

Thank you.